An Application Related to Logistics Social Responsibility Evaluation with DEMATEL and ELECTRE Methods

İskender PEKER

Abstract


Abstract. The issue of environment becomes one of the privileged areas determined in the framework of social responsibility when national and international ethical scandals are experienced in various sectors. Therefore, to analyze activities of logistics firms in the framework of social responsibility theme gains importance while evaluating the activities in terms of their environmental effects. In regard to this important aspect, the purpose of this study is determined as to specify and prioritize the criteria which logistics firms should take into account while performing their social responsibility activities then to select the logistics firm which has the highest level of social responsibility. In this manner, DEMATEL method is used for weighting the criteria and ELECTRE method is used for firm selection. Analysis results show that “breakdown of fleet composition” criteria is the most important logistics social responsibility criteria while C firm has the highest level of social responsibility.

Keywords. Logistics, Social responsibility, Multi criteria decision making.

JEL. M10, M11, M14.


Keywords


Logistics; Social responsibility; Multi criteria decision making.

Full Text:


References


Aksakal, E., & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). ANP ve DEMATEL yöntemleri ile personel seçimi problemine bütünleşik bir yaklaşım, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 905-913. doi. 10.123456.123456/gazi4056

Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497-505. doi. 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296

Carter, C.R., & Jennings, M.M. (2002). Logistics social responsibility: An integrative framework, Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145-180. doi. 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2002.tb00020.x

Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., & Chakraborty, S. (2010). Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26(5), 483-489. doi.10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.007

Ciliberti, F., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2008). Logistics social responsibility: Standard adoption and practices in Italian companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 88-106. doi. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.049

Cruz, J.M. (2013). Mitigating global supply chain risks through corporate social responsibility, Interantional Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 3995-4010. doi. 10.01080/00207543.2012.762134

Çamlıca, Z., & Akar, G.S. (2014). Lojistik sektöründe sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 11, 100-119.

Drobetz, W., Merikas, A., Merika, A., & Tsionas, M.G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of international shipping, Transportation Research Part E, 71, 18-44. doi. 10.1016/j.tre.2014.08.006

Global Reporting Initiative Content Index (2012). about. usps.com/what-we-are-doing/green/report/2012/gri/ (15.07.2015).

Halim, N.A., Abdullah, N.,& Yaakub, S. (2014). Reverse logistics: Pressure for adoption and the impact on firms performance, International Journal of Business and Society, 15(1), 151-170.

Hsueh, C.F. (2015). A bilevel programming model for corporate social responsibility collaboration in sustainable supply chain management, Transportation Research Part E, 73, 84-95. doi. 10.1016/j.tre.2014.11.006

Hsueh, C.F., & Chang, M.S. (2008). Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration, European Journal of Operational Research, 190, 116-129. doi. 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.037

Leon, R., & Juan, A.A. (2014). Promoting corporate social responsibility in logistics throuhout horizontal cooperation, Managing Global Transitions, 12(1), 79-93.

Matten, D., & Jeremy M. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424. doi. 10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458

Miao, Z., Cai, S., & Xu, D. (2012). Exploring the antecedents of logistics social responsibility: A focus on Chinese firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 18-27. doi. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.030

Murphy, P.R., & Poist, R.F. (2002). Social responsible logistics: An exploratory study, Transportation Journal, Summer, 23-35.

Ni, D., Li, K.W., & Tang, X. (2010). Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains: Insights from whosale price contracts, European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1269-1279. doi. 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.06.026

Ni, D., & Li, K.W. (2012). A game-theoretic analysis of social responsibility conduct in two-echelon supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 138, 303-313. doi. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.002

Nikolaou, I.E., Evangelinos, K.I., & Allan, S. (2013). A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 173-184. doi. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009

Poist, R.F. (1989). Evolution of conceptual approaches to the design of logistics systems: A sequel, Transportation Journal, 28(3), 35-39.

Quarshie, A.M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2015). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals, Journal of Supply Management, doi. 10.2016/j.pursup.2015.11.001

Salam, M.A. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in purchasing and supply chain, Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 355-370. doi. 10.1007/s10551-008-9733-0

Sarkis, J., Helms, M.M., & Hervani, A.A. (2010). Reverse logistics and social sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 337-354. doi. 10.1002/csr.220

Soner, S., & Önüt, S. (2006). Multi-criteria supplier selection: An ELECTRE-AHP application, Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 4, 110-120.

Süder, A. (2005). Sosyal sorumluluk kavramı ve tedarik zincirinde uygulanması, V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, 25-27 Kasım, İstanbul.

Tamulis, V., Guzavicius, A., & Zalgiryte, L. (2012). Factors influencing the use of green logistics: Theoretical implications, Economics and Management, 17(2), 706-711. doi. 10.5755/j01.em.17.2.2202

Temur, G.T., Ayvaz, B., & Bolat, B. (2015). Tersine Lojistik Yönetimi, Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Durum, Nobel AkademikYayıncılık, Ankara.

Tzeng, G.H.,Chiang, C.H., & Li, C.W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1028-1044. doi. 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004

Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1, 57-73. doi. 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2001.sp.00008

Yang, J.L., & Tzeng, G.H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1417-1424. doi. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048

Yang, Y.P.O., Shieh H.M., & Tzeng, G.H. (2013). A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment, Information Sciences, 232, 482-500. doi. 10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.012




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v3i1S.781

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Journal of Economics Bibliography - J. Econ. Bib.  - JEB - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-2387.

Editor: jeb@ksplibrary.org  Secretarial: secretarial@ksplibrary.org  Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library