The crisis and its consequences for society and economic theory

Stefan VOSS

Abstract


Abstract. The Financial Crisis (2007-09; FC) has shown that the assumptions of the neoliberal paradigm are not sufficient. The FC has also led to a Moral Crisis (MC). Ethical standards in business are deteriorating. Institutions and authorities have significantly lost its reputation due to the FC and right-wing populism has gained political influence worldwide.  This political agenda will disappear due to its own contradictions. This paper will also show, that the crisis is a crisis of theory. Economic as science is stagnating since several decades, because of its institutionalization in economic journals and in the academic environment which is conserving old methods and thinking styles. Economic theories of today are not appropriate for the solution of the actual problems. Progress in economic theory is urgently needed, because the prevailing paradigm does not solve the problems of income inequality, high unemployment levels and the destruction of the ecological sphere. The doctrine of permanent economic growth as well as austerity measures have to be scrutinized. The constantly rising pressure of unsolved problems in economics resp. economic theory must lead to a change of the current paradigm.

Keywords. Financial crisis, Neoliberal theory, GDP-growth, Austerity, Moral crisis.

JEL. A10, G01, H12, K42, Z10.

Keywords


Financial crisis; Neoliberal theory; GDP-growth; Austerity; Moral crisis.

Full Text:


References


Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism, Polity Press.

Davidson, P. (2015). Post-Keynesian Theory and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Deutsche Bundesbank, (2016). Finanzstabilitätsbericht.

EU-SILC / EU, (2018), Statistics on Income and Living Conditions

Fukuyma, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press.

Gramsci, A. (1991-2002). Gefängnishefte, Berlin, Hamburg.

Hayek, F.A. (2008[1944]). The Road to Serfdom, Routledge, London.

Heckman, J., & Moktan, S. (2018). Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. [Retrieved from].

Hull, R., & Laurence, J.P. (1969). The Peter Principle, Morrow & Company.

King, M. (2016). The End of Alchemy, Little, Brown, London.

Minsky, H.P. (1986). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, Yale University Press.

Mises, L.v. (1993). Liberalismus, Academia, Sankt Augustin.

Plickert, P. (2008). Wandlungen des Neoliberalismus, Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Polanyi, K. (2001[1944]). The Great Transformation, Beacon Press, Boston.

Dermani, E., Lindé, J., & Walentin, K. (2016). Is there an evident housing bubble in Sweden?, Sverige’s Riksbank Economic Review, 2016: 2. [Retrieved from].

Statistik zeigt unbequeme Wahrheit: Deutsche werden arm trotz Arbeit. (2018). Focus Magazin-Online, November 19.

Woman´s Own, (1987). TI Media.

World Wildlife Fund (2016), Living Planet Report:

Wright M.C. (1956). The Power Elite, Oxford University Press, New York.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v5i4.1804

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Turkish Economic Review - Turk. Econ. Rev. - TER - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0414

Editor: ter@ksplibrary.org   Secretarial: secretarial@ksplibrary.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library