Features of Formation of the National Income

Sergey Alexandrovich SURKOV, Ellen G. TROFIMOVA

Abstract


Significant indicator of economic progress of the country is the specific income per capita. Experts consider such indicator important from the point of view of forecasting of economic development. Influence of various factors is presented in references, but influence of psychological indicators, in particular, influence of personal characteristics of the population isn't considered. On material of the population of various countries of the world features of formation of the national specific income per capita are considered. The assumption that a measure of professional qualities is linear superposition of level of competence, creative abilities and specific national wealth is made. For simplification of the analysis the sum of these indicators were used as a superposition prototype to a first approximation. It is established that the sum of competence-based indicators, factors of creative opportunities and an indicator of national wealth per capita forms a specialized indicator. It is revealed that this indicator is connected with specific GNP per capita on dependence with high coefficient of correlation. Dependence linearization increases this coefficient to 0.949. It is established that in process of the movement in a zone of the countries with more considerable development of economy, influence of this indicator increases as dependence in an initial look has square character.

Keywords. Specific GNP per capita, Competence, Ccreative abilities, Specific national wealth per capita.

JEL. A10, C00, E25, O15.


Full Text:


References


Berger, M.C. (1997). Kentucky’s per capita income: Catching up to the rest of the country. Univercity of Kentucky. College of business and economic.http://cber.uky.edu/Downloads/berger97.htm.

Bezglasnaya, E.A., & Kartashova Y.R. (2015). National wealth as the ideal model of economic development. Materials correspondence electronic conference, Social and economic problems of development. http://econf.rae.ru/article/6463.

Daude, C., & Fernández-Arias E. (2010). On the Role of Productivity and Factor. Accumulation in Economic Development in Latin America and the Caribbean. IDB Working Paper Series #IDB-WP-155.

Klenowa, T.V., & Yastrebov L.I. The results of PISA -2006. Whether has the 15-year-olds the scientific literacy, necessary for the normal functioning in society.http://vio.uchim.info/Vio_55/cd_site/articles/art_3_8.htm.

Krasilnikova, V.A. (2012). The use of information and communication technologies in education. Orenburg: OSU, 26, 291.

Leonidova, G.V. (2012). Creativity population status and conditions of reproduction. Modern Studies of Ssocial Problems, 4(12), 1-12.

Mitsek, S.A., & Mitsek, E.A. (2009). Investment, productivity and incomes of citizens of the Russian Federation. Regional Economy, 36(129), 25-29.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v2i2.167

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Turkish Economic Review - Turk. Econ. Rev. - TER - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0414

Editor: ter@ksplibrary.org   Secretarial: secretarial@ksplibrary.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library