The Effect of Inward Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in Chinese Provinces
Abstract. This article examines the effect of inward foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth with a focus on Chinese provinces by conducting the Granger causality and impulse response tests in a vector auto-regression (VAR) estimation. The study contributes to the reviewed literature by examining the FDI effect in such comprehensive ways as demand-side and supply-side models, and by clearing the endogeneity problem of targeted variables under a VAR framework. The main findings of this study were as follows. First, the positive effect of FDI on economic growth in Chinese provinces was confirmed by all the model estimations: statistical, demand-side and supply-side models. Second, from the regional perspectives, the positive effect of FDI on economic growth was found in the eastern region, but not in the non-eastern region. Third, no crowding-out effect of FDI on domestic capital formation was identified both in demand-side and supply side analyses.
Keywords. Inward foreign direct investment (FDI), Economic growth, Chinese provinces, Vector auto-regression estimation.JEL. F21, O47, O53.
Agya, A.A., &Wunuji, E.A. (2014). Effect of foreign direct investment on China economic growth: A Granger Causality approach. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4), 56-63.
Chen, Y. (2007). Impact of foreign direct investment on regional innovation capability: A case of China. Journal of Data Science, 5, 577-596.
Chen, G.S., Yao, Y., & Malizard, J. (2017). Does foreign direct investment crowd in or crowd out private domestic investment in China? The effect of entry mode. Economic Modelling, 61, 409-419. doi. 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.005
Farshid, P., Ali, S., & Gholamhosein, S. (2009). The impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth – Taking China, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines & Thailand for example. China-USA Business Review, 8(12), 37-43.
Hsiao, F.S.T., & Hsiao, M.C.W. (2006). FDI, exports, and GDP in East and Southeast Asia – Panel data versus time-series causality analyses. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(6), 1082-1106. doi. 10.1016/j.asieco.2006.09.011
Levin, A., Lin, C.F., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. doi. 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Liu, Z. (2002). Foreign direct investment and technology spillover: Evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(3), 579-602. doi. 10.1006/jcec.2002.1789
Liu, Z. (2009). The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth: Based on the positive analysis in China. Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, 4, 525-545.
Liu, X., Burridge, P., & Sinclair, P.J.N. (2002). Relationships between economic growth, foreign direct investment and trade: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 34(11), 1433-1440. doi. 10.1080/00036840110100835
Long, C., Yang, J., & Zhang, J. (2015). Institutional impact of foreign direct investment in China. World Development, 66, 31-48. doi. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.001
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration; Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597-625. doi. 10.1017/S0266466604203073
Wei, H. (2002). Effects of foreign direct investment on regional economic growth in China. Economic Research Journal, 4(1), 19-26.
Xu, G., & Wang, R. (2007). The effect of foreign direct investment on domestic capital formation, trade, and economic growth in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Global Economic Journal, 7(2), 1524-5861. doi. 10.2202/1524-5861.1198Zhang, K.H. (2001). Roads to prosperity: Assessing the impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in China. International Economics, 54(1), 113-125. doi. 10.1057/9780230554412_5
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Economic and Social Thought - J. Econ. Soc. Thoug. - JEST - www.kspjournals.org
Copyright © KSP Journals