Eight Strategies for Development in Comparison

Jan PRIEWE

Abstract


Abstract. The article provides a broad-based overview on competing development strategies and the economic performance of developing countries, mainly since the year 2000. Four traditional mainstream development strategies are discussed (Washington Consensus, neo-liberalism, “good governance” and MDGs) and three long-debated key strategic issues are reconsidered (inward or outward development with export-led growth, industrialisation or growth with predominant primary goods exports, foreign-aid-based development). A heterodox approach to development with a focus on macroeconomic policies and structural change is added and discussed in more detail. Implicitly, this lays the groundwork for a macroeconomic theory of development. The rough empirical comparison finds that countries and areas with strong emphasis on macroeconomic policies, mainly in Asia, have performed unambiguously better than the mainstream approaches since 1980. From successful Asian countries, it can be learnt that a long-run continuous growth and development performance with more resilience against adverse shocks is key. Almost all larger middle-income countries have embarked on industrialisation; strategies based upon primary commodities or high current account deficits are unlikely to be successful in the long run. A stronger role of a package of six macroeconomic policies is advised, particularly for the larger economies. Size matters in this respect. Smaller countries depend stronger on market niches and idiosyncratic strategies. The global economic order, due to liberalisation of trade and finance, including the prevailing global currency system, sets harsh constraints for policy space towards implementing national strategies.  

Keywords. Development, Macroeconomic policies, Developmental state, Economic growth, Good governance, International trade, Washington Consensus, Millennium development goals.

JEL. E60, O40, O11, O20, O23, O57.

Keywords


Development; Macroeconomic policies; Developmental state; Economic growth; Good governance; International trade; Washington Consensus; Millennium development goals.

Full Text:


References


Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J.A. (2012). Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York, NY, Crown Business.

Amsden, A.H. (2001). The Rise of “The Rest”. Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. New York, NY, Oxford University Press.

Blecker, R.A., & Razmi, A. (2008). The fallacy of composition and contractionary devaluations: output effects of real exchange rate shocks. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(1), 83-109. doi. 10.1093/cje/bem021

Bresser-Pereira, L.C. (2010). Globalization and Competition. Why Some Emergent Countries Succeed and Others Fall Behind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Bruton, H.J. (1998). A Reconsideration of Import Substitution. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 903-936.

Calcagno, A. et al., (2015). Rethinking Development Strategies After the Financial Crisis. Volume I: Making the Case for Policy Space. New York-Geneva, United Nations.

Chang, H.J. (2003a). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective: Policies and Institutions for Economic Development in Historical Perspective. London and New York, Anthem Press.

Chang, H.J. (2003b). Rethinking Development Economics. London and New York, Anthem.

Chang, H.J. (2010). Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark: How development has disappeared from today’s ‘development’ discourse. In: Khan S and Christiansen S, eds. Towards New Developmentalism: Market as Means rather than Master. Abingdon, Routledge.

Chang, H., & Grabel, I. (2004). Reclaiming Development. An Alternative Economic Policy Manual. London and New York, Zed Books.

Commission on Growth and Development (2008). The Growth Report. Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. Washington, DC, World Bank.

Cypher, J. (2014). The Process of Economic Development. 4th edition. Abingdon, Routledge.

Davras, Z. (2015). Real effective exchange rates for 178 countries: A new database. [Retrieved from].

D’Arista, J. (2008). Replacing the Failed Washington Consensus. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(4), 523-539.

Davidson, P. (2004-5). A Post Keynesian View of the Washington Consensus and How to Improve It. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2), 208-230.

FEFI, Fraser Economic Freedom Index (2014). Accessed on 1 September 2014. [Retrieved from].

Frenkel, R., & Rapetti, M. (2015). The real exchange rate as a target of macroeconomic policy. [Retrieved from].

Fundação, G.V. (2014). Ten Theses on New Developmentalism. Accessed on 3 September 2014. [Retrieved from].

Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press.

Herr, H., & Kazandziska, M. (2011). Macroeconomic Policy Regimes in Western Industrial Countries. Abingdon, Routledge.

IMF. (2014 & 2015). International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. [Retrieved from].

Ishii, S., Habermeier, K.F., & Canales-Kriljenko, J.I. (2002). Capital Account Liberalization and Financial Sector Stability. IMF Occasional Paper 211. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Answering the Critics. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 4149. [Retrieved from].

Krugman, P.R., & Taylor, L. (1978). Contractionary Effects of Devaluation. Journal of International Economics, 8(3), 445-456. doi. 10.1016/0022-1996(78)90007-7

Kuczynski, P.P., & Williamson, J. (2003). After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC, Institute for International Studies.

Langbein, L., & Knack, S. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Six, One, or None? Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 350-370. doi. 10.1080/00220380902952399

Marangos, J. (2012). Post Keynesian Retort to “After the Washington Consensus. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(4), 583-609.

Mishkin, F.S. (2006). The Next Great Globalization. How Disadvantaged Nations Can Harness Their Financial Systems to Get Rich. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Moreno-Brid, J.C. et al. (2004-5). The Washington Consensus: A Latin American Perspective Fifteen Years Later. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2), 345-365.

Neto, A.F.C., & Vernengo, M. (2004-5). Fiscal Policy and the Washington Consensus: A Post Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2), 333-343.

Ocampo, J.A. (2002). Rethinking the Development Agenda. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 393-407. doi. 10.1093/cje/26.3.393

Priewe, J. (2014). Development Strategies in Comparison. Working Paper. HTW Berlin, DAAD Partnership on Economic Development Studies. [Retrieved from].

Priewe, J., & Herr, H. (2005). The Macroeconomics of Development and Poverty Reduction. Baden-Baden, NOMOS.

Rey, H. (2013). Dilemma not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Accessed on 15 August, 2014. [Retrieved from].

Rodriguez, F. & Rodrik, D. (2001) A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence. In: Bernanke BF & Rogoff K eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, 15, 261-338. MIT-Press, Cambridge Mass. [Retrieved from].

Saad-Filho, A. (2007). Life Beyond the Washington Consensus: An Introduction to Pro-Poor Macroeconomic Policies. Review of Political Economy, 19(4), 513-537. doi. 10.1080/09538250701622352

Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Taft, M.C., & Adelman, I. (1989). Nineteenth-Century Development Experience and Lessons for Today. World Development, 17(9), 1417-1432. doi. 10.1016/0305-750X(89)90083-1

Thirlwall, A.P. (2011). Balance of payments constrained growth models: history and overview. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 307-351.

Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perception Index. [Retrieved from].

UNCTAD. (2012). Trade and Development Report, 2012. Policies for Inclusive and Balanced Growth. United Nations publication, New York and Geneva.

UNCTAD. (2013). Trade and Development Report, 2013. Adjusting to the Changing Dynamics of the World Economy. United Nations publication, New York and Geneva.

United Nations. (2014). Millennium Development Goals and Beyond 2015. Available at. 29 August, 2014. [Retrieved from].

Wade, R.H. (2015). The role of industrial policy in developing countries. [Retrieved from].

WDI, (2014). World Development Indicators, World DataBank. World Bank. [Retrieved from].

Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington Means by Policy Reforms. In: Williamson J, ed. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Washington, DC, Institute of International Economics.

Williamson, J. (1997). Orthodoxy is Right: Liberalize the Capital Account Last. In: Ries CP &Sweeney RJ, eds. Capital Controls in Emerging Economies. Boulder, CO, and Oxford, Westview Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v3i3.946

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Turkish Economic Review - Turk. Econ. Rev. - TER - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0414

Editor: ter@ksplibrary.org   Secretarial: secretarial@ksplibrary.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library