Globalization, political orientation and wage inequality: From Donald Trump’s election to Angela Merkal’s re-election

Dawood MAMOON

Abstract


Abstract. The recent election results in US, Germany, Japan and China and vote for BRIXIT in Britian suggest that political outcomes increasingly relate to the economic, political and social orientation in both developed and developing countries. Countries that have not promoted social and economic harmony in the country - democracy eventually puts the pressure through the discontent local polity resulting in election outcomes similar to US presidential elections in 2016. To avoid anti-globalization feelings among local population and its negative outcomes, improving political orientation towards greater participation of local polity and investments in education in developing countries would result in more equality. The research is applicable to countries like India, China, Pakistan, Argentina, Sub-Saharan Africa who have all liberalised but still need to draw lessons from East Asia for their Industrialisation and Growth Promotion with early emphasis on Social and Institutional Development. 

Keywords. Democracy, Autocracy, Wage inequality, International trade.

JEL. E24, F40, J30.

Keywords


Democracy; Autocracy; Wage Inequality; International Trade.

Full Text:


References


Acemoglu, D. (2001). Human capital policies and the distribution of income: A framework for analysis and literature review. Treasury Working Paper Series, No.01/03. [Retrieved from].

Amann, E., Aslanidis, N., Nixon, F., & Walters, B. (2002). Economic growth and poverty alleviation: A reconsideration of Dollar and Kraay. Development Economic Discussion Papers, No.0407. [Retrieved from].

Arbache, J.S., Dickerson, A., & Green, F. (2004). Trade liberalisation and wages in developing countries. Economic Journal, 114(493), 73-96. doi. 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00188.x

Behrman, J.R., Birdsall, N., & Szekely, M. (2001). Pobreza, desigualdad, y liberalizacion comercial y financiera en America Latina. Inter American Development Bank (IADB), Washington D.C. [Retrieved from].

Cockburn, J. (2002). Trade liberalization and poverty in Nepal: A computable general equilibrium micro simulation analysis. The Centre for the Study of African Economies, Working Paper Series, No.170. [Retrieved from].

Conceicao, P., & Galbraith, J.K. (2001). Constructing Long and Dense Time Series of Inequality using the Theil Index, Eastern Economic Journal, 26(1), 61-74.

Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2003). Household welfare impacts of China’s accession to the World Trade Organization. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No.3040. [Retrieved from].

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. Economic Journal, 114(493), F22-F49. doi. 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x

Eiche, T.S., & Cecilia, G.-P. (2001). Inequality and growth: The dual role of human capital in development. Journal of Development Economics, 66(1), 173-197. doi. 10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00160-2

Fields, G. (1980) Poverty, Inequality and Development, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Friedman, J. (2000). Differential impacts of trade liberalisation on Indonesia’s poor and non-poor. Conference on International Trade and poverty, Stockholm, October 20.

Galbraith, J.K., & Kum, H. (2002). Inequality and economic growth: Data comparisons and econometric tests. The University of Texas at Austin, UTIP Working Paper, No.21. [Retrieved from].

Hanson, G., & Harisson, A. (1999). Trade and wage inequality in Mexico. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(2), 271-288. doi. 10.1177/001979399905200207

Jayasuriya, S. (2002). Globalisation, equity and poverty: The South Asian experience. Annual Global Conference of GDN, Cairo, Egypt.

Legovini, A., Bouillon, C., Lustig, N. (2001). Can education explain income inequality changes in Mexico?. Inter-American development Bank (IADB), Washington D.C. [Retrieved from].

Lofgren, H. (1999). Trade reform and the poor in morocco: A rural-urban general equilibrium analysis of reduced protection. TMD Discussion Paper, IFPRI, Washington DC. No.38. [Retrieved from].

Mamoon, D., & Murshed, S.M. (2008). Unequal skill premiums and trade liberalization: Is education the missing link?. Economics Letters, 100(2), 262-266. doi. 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.02.005

Mamoon, D., & Murshed, S.M. (2013). Education bias of trade liberalisation and wage inequality in developing countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 22(4), 572-604. doi. 10.1080/09638199.2011.589532

Murshed, S.M. (2003). Globalization is not always good: An economists perspective, Tilburg Lustrum Conference, [Retrieved from].

Ravallion, M. (2003). The debate on globalization, poverty, and inequality: Why measurement matters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No.3038, [Retrieved from].

Tinbergen, J. (1975). Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies, Amsterdam: American Elsevier.

Winters, L.A. (2004). Trade liberalization and economic performance: An overview. The Economic Journal, 114, 4-21. doi. 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00185.x

World Bank, (1993). The East Asian Miracle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

World Bank, (2001). World Development Report 2000/1. Attacking Poverty Washington DC: World Bank.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v5i1.1490

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Turkish Economic Review - Turk. Econ. Rev. - TER - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0414. Editor : editor-ter@kspjournals.org   Secretarial: secretarial@kspjournals.com   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Journals