Are Constitutional States Able to Drive the Global Technological Change?

Krzysztof WASNIEWSKI

Abstract


Abstract. The present paper aims at assessing the possible efficiency of the principle of national contributions, assumed in the 2015 Paris Framework Convention on Climate Change. Strong historical evidence indicates that any significant development of constitutional states used to take place, in the past, on the rising tide of demographic growth. Presently, we are facing global demographic slowdown, and contesters argue that constitutional states are not the right address to write to if we want breakthrough technological change. This paper assumes that the capacity of constitutional states to carry out the obligations declared in the Framework Convention, i.e. to carry out deep technological changes in the global economy, depends on their economic power, which can be estimated as their capacity to appropriate capital. Empirical data, examined in this article, indicates that since the 1980s, constitutional states have been losing their economic power, and that the overall technological progress is more and more disconnected from that economic power of governments. Moreover, constitutional states seem to be losing their capacity to experiment with their own institutions.

Keywords. Institutions, Constitutional state, Political economy.

JEL. H00, H10, H30 H80.

Keywords


Institutions; Constitutional state; Political economy.

Full Text:


References


Andersen, E.S. (2004). Population thinking, price’s equation and the analysis of economic evolution. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 1(1), 127-148. doi. 10.14441/eier.1.127

Aoki, M. (2007). Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes, Stanford University, revised version of an invited lecture at the 2005 World Congress of the International Economic Association in Morocco

Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions, The World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165-176

Braudel, F. (1981). Civilization and Capitalism, Vol. I: The Structures of Everyday Life, rev.ed., English Translation, William Collins Sons & Co London and Harper & Row New York.

Braudel, F. (1983). Civilisation and Capitalism. Part II: The Wheels of Commerce, trans. Sian Reynolds, Book Club Associates, William Collins Sons & Co.

Diamond, P.E. (1965). National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model, The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126-1150.

Feenstra, R.C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M.P. (2015), The next generation of the penn world table, The American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182. doi. 10.1257/aer.20130954

Fraser, N. (1990), Rethinking the public sphere. A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy, Social Text, 25/26, 56-80. doi. 10.2307/466240

Friedman, P., & Taylor, B. (2010). Seasteading: Institutional Innovation on the Open Ocean, Paper presented at the Australasian Public Choice Society Conference, December 9-10, 2010, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Goldman, F., & Brashares, E. (1991). Performance and accountability: Budget reform in New Zealand, Public Budgeting and Finance, 11(4), 75¬-85. doi. 10.1111/1540-5850.00921

Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis, translated by T.McCarthy, Boston.

Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society, translated by T.McCarthy, Boston.

Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussets, translated by William Rehg, Second Printing.

Harsanyi, J.C. (1966). A general theory of rational behavior in game situations, Econometrica, 34(3), 613-634. doi. 10.2307/1909772

Harsanyi, J.C. (1967). Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. Part I: The basic model. Management Science, 14(3), 159-182.

Harsanyi, J.C. (1968). Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. Part II: Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Science, 14(5), 320-334.

Harsanyi, J.C. (1953). Cardinal utility in welfare wconomics and in the theory of risk, taking. The Journal of Political Economy, 61(5), 434-435. doi. 10.1086/257416

Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The Concept of Law, 2nd edition, with a Postscript edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz.

Heath, S. (1957). Citadel, Market, and Altar. Emerging Society. Outline of Socionomy, The New Natural Science of Society, The Science of Society Foundation Inc. Baltimore.

Hodgson, G.M. (1993). Institutional economics: Surveying the 'old' and the 'new', Metroeconomica, 44(1), 1-28. doi. 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1993.tb00786.x

Hodgson, G.M. (2000). The essence of institutional economics, Journal of Economic Issues, 34(2), 317-329. doi. 10.1080/00213624.2000.11506269

Hodgson, G.M. (2006). Institutional Economics, the Individual Actor and Institutional Change, For the Alexander von Humboldt Lecture at the University of Nijmegen, December the 5th.

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2016). The World Bank, Global Economic Prospects, January 2016. [Retrieved from].

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2016). The World Bank, World Development Report 2016. Digital Dividens, [Retrieved from].

International Monetary Fund, (2015). World economic outlook October 2015, [Retrieved from].

Keefer, P. (2012). Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions, Development Research Group The World Bank, December.

McCallum, H.S. (1970). The Art of Community, Institute for Humane Studies, Inc. Menlo Park, California

Meade, J.E. (1958). Is the national debt a burden, Oxford Economic Papers, 10(2), 126-150.

Modigliani, F. (1961). Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt, Economic Journal, 71(284), 730-755. doi. 10.2307/2228247

Parsons, T., Shils, E.A., & Smelser, N.J. (1965). Toward A General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. Transaction Publishers.

Schlatter, R. (1951). Private Property, the History of an Idea, New Brunswick: N.J., Rutgers University Press.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1939). Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York Toronto London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Searle, J.R. (2005). What is an institution?. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1-22. doi. 10.1017/S1744137405000020

Selten, R. (1975). Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Journal International Journal of Game Theory, 4(1), 25-55. doi. 10.1007/BF01766400 Reprint: Kuhn, H.W. (ed.), Classics in Game Theory, Princeton University Press, 1997, pp. 317-354.

Steinberg, P.E., Nyman, E., & Caraccioli, M.J. (2011). Atlas swam: Freedom, capital, and floating sovereignties in the seasteading vision, Antipode, 44(4), 1532-1550. doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00963.x

Taylor, C. (2011). A Macroeconomic Regime for The 21st Century. Towards a new economic order – Routledge, Taylor & Francis, London and New York.

Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton University Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Univ of California Press.

Weingast, B. (1981). Regulation, reregulation, and deregulation: The political foundations of agency clientele relationships, Law and Contemporary Problems, 44(1), 147-177.

Weingast, B.R., Shepsle, K.A., & Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics, The Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 642-664. doi. 10.1086/260997

Weingast, B. (1995). The economic role of political institutions, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(1), 1-31.

World Trade Organization, (2015). World Trade Report.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jel.v3i2.815

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Journal of Economics Library - J. Econ. Lib. - JEL - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-2379

Editor: [email protected] Secretarial: [email protected]   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library