[Social Constitution and the form of the Capitalist State], Sosyal Yapı ve Kapitalist Devlet Sorunu

Werner BONEFELD

Abstract


1970’lerin sonundaki devletin kökenine ilişkin tartışmalarının yavaşlamasından sonra (1), 1980’lerin başında neredeyse bütün kapitalist ülkelerde devlete olan ilgi, güce vurgu yapan muhafazakârlıkla yeniden meydana çıktı. Kapitalist devlet üzerine yapılan son çalışma (post-)Fordizm üzerindeki tartışmalardan etkilenmiştir (bkz: Hirsch & Roth, 1986) (2). (Post-)fordist devlet tartışması, devlet ve ekonomi arasındaki ilişkilerdeki değişimi daha iyi bir şekilde anlayabilmek için devletin daha somut bir şekilde kavramsallaştırmasını amaçlamaktadır. Burada temel sorun devletin kökeni tartışmasını reddetmek değil, bu tartışmayı kapitalist gelişme teorisi içerisinde sınıflandırmaktır. Bu şekilde, yapı ve çatışma arasındaki ilişki olarak yıllardır Marksist tartışmanın konusu olan bu tema, çağdaş gelişmeler bağlamında daha somut bir şekilde tartışılmaktadır. (Post-)fordizm üzerindeki tartışmanın önemli bir zayıf noktasının, yapı ve çatışmayı eklemlememek olduğunu başka bir yerde tartıştım (bkz: Bonefeld, 1987a). Zaten bu zayıflık Hirsch’in devletin kökeni tartışmasına yaptığı katkılarda da görülmüştü (bkz: Holloway, 1988).

Full Text:


References


Agnoli, J. (1975). Überlegungen zum bürgerlichen Staat, Berlin: Wagenbach Klaus GmbH.

Agnoli, J. (1986). Zwanzig Jagre danach: die Transformation der Demokratie. Prokla, 62, 4-70.

Althusser, L. (1975). Reading Capital, London: The Gresham Press.

Althusser, L. (1977). Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays, London: New Left Books.

Backhaus, H.-G. (1974). Materialien zur Rekonstruktion der Marksschen Werttheorie. in Gesellschaft, Edited by H-G. Backhaus, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Backhaus, H.-G. (1986). Zum Problem des Geldes als Konstituens oder Apriori der ökonomischen Gegenstandlichkeit. Prokla, 63, 23-62.

Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming Reality, London: Verso.

Bhaskar, R. et. al.(1988). Philosophical Underlabouring. Interlink, 8,

Blanke, B., Jürgens, U. & Kastendiek, H. (1978). On the Current Marksist Discussion on the Analyses of the Form and Function of the Bourgeois State. In State and Capital: A Marksist Debate, Edt J. Holloway & S. Picciotto. London: Edward Arnold.

Bonefeld, W. (1987a). Reformulation of State Theory. Capital & Class, 33, 96-127. (reprinted in W. Bonefeld & J. Holloway (1991).)

Bonefeld, W. (1987b). Marksism and the Concept of Mediation. Common Sense, 2, 67-72.

Bonefeld, W. (1987c). Open Marksism. Common Sense, 1, 34-38.

Bonefeld, W. (1988). The Permanence of primitive Accumulation. Common Sense, 6, 41-53.

Bonefeld, W. & Holloway, J. (eds.) (1991) Post Fordism and Social Form, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Clarke, S. (1977). Marksism, Sociology and Poulantzas’ Theory of the State. Capital & Class, 1(2), 1-31.

Clarke, S. (1978). Capital, Fractions of Capital and the state, "Neo-Marksist" Analysis of the South African State. Capital & Class, 2(2), 32-77.

Clarke, S. (1980). The Value of Value: Rereading Capital. Capital & Class, 10, 1-17.

Clarke, S. (1982). Marks, Marginalism and Modern Sociology, London: Macmillan.

Clarke, S. (1983). Comment on Jessop. Kapitalistate, 10/11, 113-134.

Clarke, S. (1988a). Keynesianism, Monetarism and the Crisis of the State, Aldershot.

Clarke, S. (1988b). Overaccumulation, class struggle and the regulation approach. Capital & Class, 12(3), 59-92. (reprinted in W. Bonefeld & J. Holloway, (1991).).

Clarke, S. (1989). Review article on M. Itoh's 'Basic Understanding of Capitalism' in Capital & Class, 13(1), 133-149.

Clarke, S. (1991). The State Debate, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Elson, D. (1979). The Value Theory of Labour. in Elson (ed.) Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, London: Humanities Press Intl.

Gerstenberger, H. (1989). Marksist State Theory Revisited. paper presented to the annual Conference of the Conference of Socialist Economists Sheffield, July 1989.

Gunn, R. (1987a). Marksism and Mediation. Common Sense, 2, 57-66.

Gunn, R. (1987b). Practical Reflexivity in Marks. Common Sense, 1, 39-51.

Gunn, R. (1987c). Notes on Class. Common Sense, 2, 15-25.

Gunn, R. (1987d). Rights. Edinburgh Review, 77, 1-4.

Gunn, R. (1989). Marksism and Philosophy: the conceptual status of Marksist categories in the light of Critical Realist Critique. Capital & Class, 13(1), 87-116.

Gunn, R. (1991). Marksism, Metatheory and Critique, in Bonefeld & Holloway (1991).

Hirsch, J. (1976). Bemerkungen zum theoretischen Ansatz einer Analyse des biirgerlichen Staates, in Gesellschaft 8/9, Frankfurt.

Hirsch, J. (1977). Kapitalreproduktion, Klassenauseinadersetzungen und Widerspruche im Staatsapparat, in Handbuch V Staat, edited by Brandesl Hoffmann, Jiirgens & Semmier: Koln.

Hirsch, J. (1978). The State Apparatus and Social Reproduction: Elements of a Theory of the Bourgeois State, in Holloway & Picciotto (1978).

Hirsch, J. & Roth, R. (1986). Das neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Vorn Fordismus zum Post-Fordismus, Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.

Holloway, J. (1980). State as Class Practice, in Research in Political Economy, 3, 1-25.

Holloway, J. (1988). The Great Bear, Post-Fordism and class struggle: a comment on Bonefeld and Jessop, in Capital & Class, 36, London. Reprinted in Bonefeld & Holloway (1991).

Holloway, J. & Picciotto, S. (1977). Capital, Crisis, and the State, Capital & Class, 2, London. Reprinted in Clarke (1991).

Holloway, J. & Picciotto, S. (1978). (eds.) State and Capital, A Marksist Debate, London.

Jessop, B. (1982). The Capitalist State, Oxford.

Jessop, B. (1983). State forms, social Basis and Hegemonic Projects, Kapitalistate, no. 10/11.

Jessop, B. (1985). Nicos Poulantzas, Marksist Theory and Political Strategy, Basingstoke.

Jessop, B. (1986). The Economy, The State, and the Law, Th.eori~s of Re~ative Autonomy and Autopoietic Closure (European University Institute, Florence.

Jessop, B. (1988). Regulation theory, post Fordism and the state: more than a reply to Werner Bonefeld, Capital & Class, no. 34, London. Reprinted in Bonefeld & Holloway (1991).

Jessop, B. (1988b). Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect, (University of Bielefeld, Zentrum fur interdisziplinare Forschung, Bielefeld.

Jessop et.al., (1988). Jessop, Bonnet, Bromley, Ling, Thatcherism, a Tale of Two Nations, London.

London, J. (1980). In and Against the State, London.

Lukacs, G. (1968). Geschichte und Klassenbewussbstein, Frankfurt.

Marazzi, C. (1976). Money in the World Crisis: The New Basis of Capitalist Power, Zerowork. Political Materials 2, New York.

Marks, K. (1966). Capital. Vol.3, London, Lawrence and Wishart.

Marks, K. (1969). “Die Klassenkampfe in Frankreich 1848-1850”, in MEW 7, Berlin.

Marks, K. (1963). Grundrisse, Middlesex, Penguin.

Marks, K. (1974). Grundrisse, German Edition, Berlin.

Marks, K. (1976). Theorien Uber den Mehrwert, vol. 111, MEW 26.3, Berlin.

Marks, K. (1978). Capital vol.2, (Middlesex, Penguin).

Marks, K. (1981). “Zur Kritik der Politschen Okonomie”, in MEW 13, Berlin.

Marks, K. (1983). Capital vol. 1, London, Lawrence and Wishart.

Marks, K. & Engels, F. (1958). “Die deutsche Ideologie”, in MEW3, Berlin.

Negri, A. (1984). Marks Beyond Marks, Lessons on the Grundrisse, Massachusetts, Bergin & Garvey.

Negri, A. (1988). Keynes and Capitalist Theories of the State Post-1929, Toni Negri Revolution Retrieved, edited by Red Notes Italian Archive, London.

Negri, A. (1989). The Politics of Subversion, London.

Negri, A. (1984). “Was ist und zu wechem Zweck benotigen wir heute eine Erneuerung des Marksismus? Rede zurn hundersten Todestag von Karl Marks”, PROKLA, no. 55 Berlin.

Negt, O. & Kluge, A. (1971). Offentlichkeit und Erfahrung, Frankfurt.

Poulantzas, N. (1973). Political Power and Social Classes, London.

Poulantzas, N. (1974). Fascism and Dictatorship, London.

Poulantzas, N. (1980). State Power Socialism, London.

Psychopedis, K. (1988). Notes on Mediation Analysis, Common Sense, no. 5, Edinburgh June 1988.

Psychopedis, K. (1991). Crisis Theory in contemporary Social Sciences, in Bonefeld & Holloway (1991).

Reichelt, H. (1978). Some remarks on Flatow and Huisken's Essay “On the Problems of the Derivation of the Bourgeois State”, in Holloway & Picciotto (1978).

V. Braunmühl, E. (1976). Die Internationale Organisiertheit der biirgerlichen Gesellschaft, in Gesellschaft 8/9, Frankfurt.

V. Braunmuhl, E. (1978). On the Bourgeois nation State within the World Market Context, in Holloway & Picciotto (1978).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v1i2.69

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Journal of Economics and Political Economy - J. Econ. Pol. Econ. - JEPE - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2148-8347

Editor: [email protected]   Secretarial: [email protected]   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library