Are they willing to participate? A review on behavioral economics approach to voters turnout

Mostafa Raeisi SARKANDIZ

Abstract


This article investigates the fundamental factors influencing the rate and manner of Electoral participation with an economic model-based approach. In this study, the structural parameters affecting people's decision making are divided into two categories. The first category includes general topics such as economic and livelihood status, cultural factors and, also, psychological variables. In this section, given that voters are analyzed within the context of consumer behavior theory, inflation and unemployment are considered as the most important economic factors. The second group of factors focuses more on the type of voting, with emphasis on government performance. Since the incumbent government and its supportive voters are in a game with two Nash equilibrium, and also because the voters in most cases are retrospect, the government seeks to keep its position by a deliberate change in economic factors, especially inflation and unemployment rates. Finally, to better understand the issue, a hypothetical example is presented and analyzed in a developing country in the form of a state-owned populist employment plan.

Keywords. Voters turnout, Behavioral economics, Bandwagon effect, Economic voters, Hyperbolic memory discount.

JEL. A13, C70, D11.

Keywords


Voters Turnout; Behavioral Economics; Bandwagon Effect; Economic Voters; Hyperbolic Memory Discount

Full Text:


References


Agranov, M., Goeree, J., Romero, J., & Yariv, L. (2017). What makes voter turnout:The effect of polls and beliefs. Journal of European Economic Association, 16(3), 825-856. doi. 10.1093/jeea/jvx023

Bartolini, L., & Cottarelli, C. (1994). Government Ponzi games and the sustainability of public deficits under uncertainty. Ricerche Economiche, 48(1), 1-22. doi. 10.1016/0035-5054(94)90017-5

Bennett, J.T., & Orzechowski, W.P. (1983). The voting behavior of bureaucrats:Some empirical evidence. Public Choice, 41, 271-283. doi. 10.1007/BF00210361

Besanko, D., & Braeutigam, R. (2014). Microeconomics (Fifth Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2004). Where does turnout decline come erom?, European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 221-236. doi. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00152.x

Borcherding, T.E., Bush, W.C., & Spann, R.M. (1977). The effects on public spending of the divisibility of public outputs in consumption, bureaucrats: Power, and the size of the tax-sharing group. In, Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Source of Government Growth, T.E. Borcherding (Edt), Durham: Duke University Press.

Burden, B.C., & Wichowsky, A. (2014). Economic discontent as a mobilizer: Unemployment and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 76(4), 887-898. doi. 10.1017/S0022381614000437

Bush, W.C., & Denzau, A.T. (1977). The voting behavior of bureaucrats and public sector growth. In, Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Source of Government Growth, T.E. Borcherding (Edt), Durham: Duke University Press.

CAWP. (2015). Gender Differences in Voter Turnout. Center for American Women and Politics, CAWP.

Corey, E.C., & Garand, J.C. (2002). Are government employees more likely to vote: An analysis of turnout in the 1996 U.S. national election. Public Choice, 111, 259-283. doi. 10.1023/A:1015290806607

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Edlin, A., Gelman, A., & Kaplan, N. (2007). Voting as a rational choice. Rationality and Society, 19(3), 293-314. doi. 10.1177/1043463107077384

Findley, T.S. (2015). Hyperbolic memory discounting and the political business cycle. European Journal of Political Economy, 40(B), 345-359. doi. 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.08.002

Germann, M., & Serdult, U. (2017). Internet voting and turnout: Evidence from Switzerland. Electoral Studies, 47, 1-12. doi. 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.03.001

Grillo, A. (2017). Risk aversion and bandwagon effect in the pivotal voter model. Public Choice, 172(3), 465-482. doi. 10.1007/s11127-017-0457-5

Gronke, P., Galanes-Rosenbaum, E., Miller, P.A., & Toffey, D. (2008). Convenience voting. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 437-455. doi. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912

Grosser, J., & Schram, A. (2010). Public opinion polls,voter turnout,and welfare:An experimental study. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 700-717. doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00455.x

International IDEA Institute, (2020). [Retrieved from].

Iran Election Headquarters, (2021). [Retrieved from].

Jehle, G.A., & Reny, P.J. (2011). Advanced Microeconomic Theory. London: Pearson Education.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. doi. 10.2307/1914185

Killian , M., Schoen, R., & Dusso, A. (2008). Keeping up with the Joneses: The interplay of personal and collective evaluations in voter turnout. Political Behavior, 30(3), 323-340. doi. 10.1007/s11109-007-9051-8

Kiss, A., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Identifying the bandwagon effect in two-round elections. Public Choice, 160, 327-344. doi. 10.1007/s11127-013-0146-y

Klov, E.F., & Winter, E. (2007). The welfare effects of public opinion polls. International Journal of Game Theory, 193, 379-394. doi. 10.1007/s00182-006-0050-5

Lau, R.R., & Redlawsk, D.P. (2006). How Voters Decide. Cambridge University Press.

Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumer's demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183-207. doi. 10.2307/1882692

Lewis-Beck, M.S., & Paldam, M. (2000). Economic voting: An introduction. Electoral Studies, 19(2-3), 113-121. doi. 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00042-6

Lott, J.R. (2005). The impact of early media election calls on Republican voting rates in Florida's Western Panhandle counties in 2000. Public Choice, 120, 349-361. doi. 10.1007/s11127-005-7166-1

Lublin, D., & Tate, K. (1995). Racial group competition in urban election. In P.E. Peterson (Edt), Classifying by Race. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Luechinger, S., Rosinger, M., & Alois, S. (2007). The impact of postal voting on participation: Evidence for Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 13(2), 167-202. doi. 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00075.x

Lutz, G. (2007). Low turnout in direct democracy. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 624-632. doi. 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.008

Miller, P., & Powell, S. (2015). Overcoming,voting obstacles: The use of convenience voting by voters with disabilities. American Politics Research, 44(1), 1-28. doi. 10.1177/1532673X15586618

Nezi, R. (2012). Economic voting under the economic crisis: Evidence from Greece. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 498-505. doi. 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.007

Nordhaus, W.D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169-190. doi. 10.2307/2296528

Pacek, A.C. Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J.A. (2009). Disenchanted or discerning: Voter turnout in post-communist countries. Journal of Politics, 71(2), 473-491. doi. 10.1017/s0022381609090409

Radcliff, B. (1992). The welfare state, turnout, and the economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 444-454. doi. 10.2307/1964232

Reidy, T., Suiter, J., & Breen, M. (2017). Boom and bust: Economic voting in Ireland. Politics, 38(2), 1-17. doi. 10.1177/0263395716680827

Riker, W.H., & Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. The American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25-42. doi. 10.2307/1953324

Robbins, J.W. (2010). The personal vote and voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 29(4), 661-672. doi. 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.07.001

Tytler, A. (1840). Universal History,From the Creation of the World to the Eighteenth Century. Boston: Hilliard,Gray and Co.

Uhlaner, C.J. (1989). Rational turnout: The neglected role of groups. American Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 390-422. doi. 10.2307/2111153

Washington, E. (2006). How black candidates affect voter turnout. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 973-998. doi. 10.1162/qjec.121.3.973

Zech, C.E. (1975). Leibenstein's effect as applied to voting. Public Choice, 21, 117-122. doi. 10.1007/BF01705954




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v8i1.2169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Journal of Economics and Political Economy - J. Econ. Pol. Econ. - JEPE - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2148-8347

Editor: [email protected]   Secretarial: [email protected]   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library