Public Attitude to Nuclear Energy from Climate Change and Energy Security Perspectives in Turkey

Korkmaz YILDIRIM, Musa GÜN

Abstract


Abstract. Most of the energy-environmental policy studies have argued nuclear energy since the second half of the 20th century as it includes a number of risk factors such as high cost of plant building, radiation, diseases, power plant accidents, nuclear waste, nuclear weapon proliferation and terrorism. The length and severity of the nuclear energy debates vary from country to country based on the several factors, in particular, the economic and social development level of the countries. Due to increasing global environmental concerns such as climate change, loss of biodiversity, natural research depletion, deforestation, ozone layer depletion and recent problems that countries experienced in terms of energy security, especially for such developing countries as Turkey, the governments have relaunched nuclear energy program again and follow their energy policy agenda in spite of occasional anti-nuclear protests in the society. In this regard, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate the public attitude in Turkey to nuclear energy in terms of environmental values like climate change and energy security and at the same time to examine reconciliation of environmental values and energy security with public attitude to nuclear energy. In the literature, many studies concerning environmental values, energy security, and attitudes towards nuclear energy have been conducted for only industrialized countries such as the USA, England, and Japan. However, developing countries with a high energy demand, technical and financial difficulties for low-carbon and renewable energy technology have been neglected, which is the source of inspiration and motivation for this study. The main finding of the study is that environmental values, especially, climate change plays a more important role in public attitude to nuclear energy in the community than energy security, which might be evaluated as an essential input for relevant stakeholders on energy policy in Turkey.

Keywords. Nuclear energy, Public attitude, Climate change, Energy security.

JEL. O13, Q42, Q54.

Keywords


Nuclear energy, Public attitude, Climate change, Energy security

Full Text:


References


Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni I., Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation, and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 145-169. doi. 10.1177/0963662506066719

Bisconti, A.S. (2010). Public opinion snapshot, A report prepared for the Nuclear Energy Institute, [Retrieved from].

Bolsen, T., & Cook, F.L. (2008). The polls-trends. public opinion on energy policy: 1974–2006. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 364-388. doi. 10.1093/poq/nfn019

Brook, B., W. (2012). Could nuclear fission energy, etc., Solve the greenhouse problem? The affirmative case. Energy policy, 42, 4-8. doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.041

Caldicot, H. (2014). Nükleer Enerji Çözüm Değil (Ne Küresel Isınmaya, Ne De Başka Bir Şeye). Trans. by Korol Diker, İstanbul: Yeni İnsan Yayinevi.

Corner, A, Venables, D., Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Demski, C., & Pidgeon, N.F. (2011). Nuclear power, climate change, and energy security: exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy, 39(9), 4823-4833. doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.037

Cyranoski, D. (2012). Japan considers nuclear-free future Options require big boost for renewable energy sources. Nature, International Weekly Journal of Science, [Retrieved from].

Demski, C., Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2013). Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes, and Acceptability - Summary findings of a survey conducted August 2012. UKERC, London.

DOGAKA, (2014). Enerji Sektör Raporu, TR63 Bölgesi, Dogu Akdeniz Kalkınma Ajansi. [Retrieved from].

EPDK, (2011). EPDK’dan lisans almış olan inşa halindeki projelerin ilerleme durumlar. [Retrieved from].

GDİ-General Directorate of Industry, (2012). Türkiye Elektrik ve Elektronik Sektörü Strateji Belgesi ve Eylem Plani 2012-2016, Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknolloji Bakanlığı. [Retrieved from].

EUAS, Elektrik Üretim Anonim Şirketi (2010). Elektrik Üretim Sektör Raporu, 2010, [Retrieved from].

Güray, B.Ş. (2009). Elektrik sektöründe arz-talep analizleri, beklentiler ve hedefler, 11. Uluslararası Enerji Arenası, Kasım 2009

Hayashi, M., & Hughes, L. (2013). The policy responses to the Fukushima nuclear accident and their effect on Japanese energy security, Energy Policy, 59, 86-101. doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.059

IEA, International Energy Agency (2014). World Energy Outlook-2014, Executive Summary, [Retrieved from].

IEA, International Energy Agency (2015). Excerpt from Electricity Information (2015 Edition), [Retrieved from].

IEA, International Energy Agency (2015). Turkey, International energy data, and analysis, [Retrieved from]

Lake, J.A., Bennett, R.G., & Kotek, J.F., (2009). Next Generation Nuclear Power. Scientific American. [Retrieved from].

MENR, (2013). Energy balance for Turkey in period of 1990-2012, Minister of Energy and Natural Research in the Republic of Turkey. [Retrieved from].

NEA, (2014). Country profile: Turkey, Summary figures for 2013. Nuclear, Energy Agency. [Retrieved from].

NEI, (2015). Top Ten Nuclear Generating Countries. Nuclear Energy Institute. [Retrieved from].

OECD, (2015). Nuclear Energy Data 2014, OECD Publishing. Paris. doi. 10.1787/ned-2014-en-fr

Özdemir, N., & Çobanoğlu, E.O. (2008). Türkiye’de nükleer santrallerin kurulmasi ve nükleer enerji kullanimi konusundaki öğretmen adaylarinin tutumlari. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 218-232.

Palabıyık, H, Yavaş, H., & Aydın, M. (2010). Türkiye’de nükleer santral kurulabilir mi? çatışmadan uzlaşıya: türkiye’de nükleer enerji projelerinde sosyal kabul sorunu ve halkın reddetme sendromunun araştırılması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(2), 175-201.

Pidgeon, N., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power–no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environ Change 18(1), 69-85. doi. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005

Poortinga, W., Aoyagi, M., & Pidgeon, N.F. (2013). Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan. Energy Policy. 62, 1204-1211. doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.015

Sayman, R.U., Akpulat, O., & Baş, B. (2014). İklim Değişikliği CEO algı araştırması, türk iş dünyası liderlerinin iklim değişikliğine yanıtı. Bölgesel Çevre Merkez (REC), Ankara, [Retrieved from].

Schneider, M., Froggatt, A., Hazemann, J., Katsuta, T., Ramana, M.V., & Thomas, S., (2015), The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2015, Paris, London, July 2015. [Retrieved from].

Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Public perceptions of energy choices: the influence of beliefs about climate change and the environment, Energy & Environment, 21(5), 385-407. doi. 10.1260/0958-305X.21.5.385

TBMM, 9th Development Plan, (2007 – 2013). Official Journal, No: 26215, TBMM

TBMM, Akkuyu Nuclear power plants projects, Official Journal, No: 28240, TBMM

TEİAŞ, (2010). Türkiye Elektrik Enerjisi 10 Yıllık Üretim Kapasite Projeksiyonu (2010-2019), Türkiye Elektirik İletim Anonim Şirketi, Ekim.

TEİAŞ, (n.d). 2010 yılı aylık üretim istatistikleri, Türkiye Elektirik İletim Anonim Şirketi. [Retrieved from].

Teravainen, T., Lehtonen, M., & Martiskainen, M. (2011). Climate change, energy security and risk - debating nuclear new build in Finland, France, and the UK. Energy Policy 39(4), 3434-3442. doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.041

Truelove, H.B., & Greenberg, M. (2013). Who has become more open to nuclear power because of climate change?. Climatic Change, 116(2), 389-409. doi. 10.1007/s10584-012-0497-2

Visschers, V.H.M., Keller, C., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3621-3629. doi. 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064

WEC, World Energy Council (2012). Dünya Enerji Konseyi Türk Milli Komitesi, Enerji Raporu. Ankara.

WEF, (2009). Energy security, summit on the global agenda 2009 Council Reports (2009). World Economic Forum, on November 13, 2012. [Retrieved, from].

Winrow, G.M., (2013). The southern gas corridor and Turkey’s role as an energy transit state and energy hub, Insight Turkey, 15(1), 145-163.

WNA, World Nuclear Association (2015a). Nuclear power in the world today. [Retrieved from].

WNA, World Nuclear Association (2015b). World nuclear power reactors & uranium requirements. [Retrieved from].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v3i2.812

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences - J. Adm. Soc. Sci. - JSAS - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0406

Editor: editor-jsas@kspjournals.org   Secretarial: secretarial@kspjournals.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library