Corruptive intention and anti-citizenship behavior: A study of the impact of workplace dissatisfaction among personnel in the Cameroonian public health care sector
Abstract
Abstract. This study focuses on the sociocognitive processes that generally affect actors in the public administration and undermine their values, ethics, and the sense of providing a free and equitable public service, as recognized in administrative bureaucracies. We started with the following research question: What are the direct underlying determinants of corruptible behavior among public health personnel? Through a dual analysis of correlation and mediation using structural equation modeling, a confirmatory figure was presented, demonstrating the mediating effect (Hayes, 2018) of workplace distress on Corruptive Behavioral Intention (CBI) on one hand, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) on the other.
Keywords. Corruptive intention; Anti-citizenship behavior; Workplace distress; Public health personnel.
JEL. F13; F14; Q54.Keywords
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bandura, A. (2003). Auto-efficacité. Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle. Paris.
Bardin, L. (2011). Content Analisis. Sao Paulo: Edicoes.
Bastard, B. (2013). Désirable et exigeante: la régulation négociée des relations dans le couple et la famille. Dialogue, 200. 109-119. doi. 10.3917/dia.200.0109
Cialdini, R. ., Martin, S.J., & Goldstein, N.J. (2015). Small behavioral science-informed changes can produce large policy-relevant effects. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), 21-27. doi. 10.1177/237946151500100104
CONAC (2010). National Strategy to Fight Corruption 2010-2015. [Retrieved from].
CONAC (2011, 2012). National Anti-Corruption Commission. [Retrieved from] .
Quivy, R., & Van Campenhoudt, L. (1995). Manual of research in social sciences, 2nd edition. DUNOD.
Eyssartier, C., Joule, R.-V., & Guimelli, C. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive effects of engagement in a preparatory act activating a central versus peripheral element of organ donation representation. Psychologie Française, 52(4), 499-517. doi. 10.1016/j.psfr.2007.01.004
Fortin, M-F. & Gagnon, J. (2016). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche : Methodes quantitatives et qualitatives (3ième édition). Chenelière éducation.
Gaudet, S (2005). Qu’est-ce que répondre de soi à l’adulte ? Revue canadienne de sociologie et d’anthropologie, Canadian Review in Sociology and Anthropology, 42, 25-50.
Gross, J.J., &John, O.P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotions for affect, relationships, and well being, Journal of Personnality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. doi. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
Morgan, S.E., Movius, L., & Cody, M.J. (2009). The power of narratives: The effect of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and non-donors. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 135-151. doi. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01408.x
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101-117. doi. 10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101
Reynaud, E (2003). Les règles de l’emploi, Dans De Terssac Gilbert (dir), la théorie de la régulation sociale de Jean Daniel Reynaud. Débats et prolongements. La Decouverte, pp.149-155.
Reynaud, J.D. (1995). Le conflit, la négociation et la règle. Octarès.
Skinner, B. F. (1958). Reinforcement today, American Psychologist, 13(3), 94-99. doi. 10.1037/h0049039
Spector, P. (2011). Work and Organizational Psychology. De Boeck Group.
Transparency International. (2014). Combating Corruption: Issues and Perspectives. Karthala.
Hayes, A.F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Methodology in social sciences) (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Transparency International. (2014). Corruption in Cameroon. [Retrieved from].
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v10i1-2.2436
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences - J. Adm. Soc. Sci. - JSAS - www.kspjournals.org
ISSN: 2149-0406
Editor: editor-jsas@kspjournals.org Secretarial: secretarial@kspjournals.org Istanbul - Turkey.
Copyright © KSP Library