Assessing Multi-aspects and Integral Sustainability of Bulgarian Farms

Hrabrin Ianouchev BACHEV

Abstract


Abstract. The issue of assessment sustainability of agricultural farms as a whole and of different type is among the most topical for researchers, farmers, investors, administrators, politicians, interests groups and public at large. Despite that practically there are no assessments on sustainability level of Bulgarian farms in conditions of European Union Common Agricultural Policy implementation. This article applies a holistic framework and assesses sustainability of Bulgarian farms as a whole and of different juridical type, size, production specialization, and ecological and geographical location. Initially the method of the study is outlined, and overall characteristics of surveyed holdings presented. After that an assessment is made of integral, governance, economic, social, environmental sustainability of farms in general and of different type and location. Next, structure of farms with different sustainability levels is analyzed. Finally, factors for improving sustainability of Bulgarian farms are identified, and directions for further research and amelioration of farm management and public intervention in the sector suggested.Our study has found out that overall sustainability of Bulgarian farms is at a good level, with superior levels for environmental and social sustainability, and inferior level for governance and economic sustainability. There are great variations in sustainability levels of farms of different type and location as well as in shares of holdings with unlike level of sustainability. Factors which stimulate to the greatest extent the actions of Bulgarian farms for improving individual aspects of sustainability are Access to Advisory Services, Professional Training of Manager and Hired Labor, Personal Conviction and Satisfaction, Positive Experience of Other Farms, Available Innovations, Financial Capability, Private Contracts and Agreements, and Registration and Certification of Products, Services, etc. National and European mechanisms of regulation and support, which affect to the greatest extent economic sustainability of Bulgarian farms are: Direct Area Based Payments, National Tops Ups for Products, Livestock, etc., Modernization of Agricultural Holdings, Green Payments, Support to Semi-market Farms.

Keywords. Farm sustainability, Governance, Ecological aspects, Factors of sustainability, EU CAP impact, Bulgaria.

JEL. Q10, Q56, R33.


Keywords


Farm sustainability; Governance; Ecological aspects; Factors of sustainability; EU CAP impact; Bulgaria.

Full Text:


References


Andreoli, M., & Tellarini, V. (2000). Farm sustainability evaluation: methodology and practice, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 77(1), 43-52. doi. 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00091-2

Bachev, H. (2004). Efficiency of agrarian organizations, in farm management and rural planning, No.5, (pp.135-150), Kyushu University, Fukuoka.

Bachev, H. (2005). Assessment of Sustainability of Bulgarian Farms, proceеdings, XIth Congress of The European Association of Agricultural Economists, Copenhagen.

Bachev, H. (2010). Governance of Agrarian Sustainability, New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Bachev, H. (2013). Risk management in agri-food sector, Contemporary Economics, 7(1), 45-62.Bachev H. (2016). A framework for assessing sustainability of farming enterprises, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 9(1), 24-43.Bachev, H. (2016a). Sustainaility of farming enterprise: Understanding, governance, evaluation, Ekohomika, 2(179), 6-15.

Bachev, H. (2016b). The sustainability of farms, Economics, 1(2), 20-53.

Bachev, H. (2016c). About governance and evaluation of sustainability of farming enterprise, Social and Administrative Sciences, 3(2), 161-201.

Bachev, H. (2016d). An approach to assess sustainability of agricultural farm, Turkish Economic Review, 3(1) 29-53.

Bachev, H. (2016e). What is sustainability of farms? Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 3(1), 35-48.

Bachev, H., & Peeters, A. (2005). Framework for assessing sustainability of farms, in farm management and rural planning, No.6, (pp.221-239), Kyushu University, Fukuoka.

Bachev, H., Koteva, N.,Kaneva, K., Terziev, D., & Vanev, D. (2016). Sustainability of Bulgarian farms during reformed CAP implementation, Proceedings of International Conference, October 27-28, Sofia.

Bastianoni, S., Marchettini, N., Panzieri, M., & Tiezzi, E. (2001). Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy), Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(4), 365-373. doi. 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00079-2EC, (2001). A Framework for Indicators for the Economic and Social Dimensions of Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission. [Retrieved from].

FAO, (2013). SAFA. Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems indicators, FAO.

Fuentes, M. (2004). Farms management indicators related to the policy dimension in the European Union, OECD Expert Meeting on Farm Management Indicators and the Environment, 8-12 March, New Zealand

Häni, F., Pintér, L., & Herren, H. (2006). Sustainable agriculture. From common principles to common practice, Proceedings of First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA), March 16, Switzerland.

OECD, (2001). Environmental indicators for agriculture. Vol.3, Methods and Results. OECD, Paris.

Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., & Burton, M. (2001). Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice, Ecological Economics, 39(3), 463–478. doi. 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00245-2

Sauvenier, X., Valekx, J., Van Cauwenbergh, N., Wauters, E., Bachev, H., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Garcia-Cidad, V., Goyens, S., Hermy, S., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Vanclooster, M., & Peeters, A. (2005). Framework for Assessing Sustainability Levels in Belgium Agricultural Systems – SAFE, Belgium Science Policy, Brussels.

UN, (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations Resolution A/RES/70/1 of 25 September.

Williamson, O. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v4i1.1186

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences - J. Adm. Soc. Sci. - JSAS - www.kspjournals.org

ISSN: 2149-0406

Editor: editor-jsas@kspjournals.org   Secretarial: secretarial@kspjournals.org   Istanbul - Turkey.

Copyright © KSP Library